/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10017960
Found it.
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/07/07/does-temperature-control-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide-concentrations/
The graph posted in this thread is a simplified version of the same graph seen here (the graph in this link/the graph I posted with this post). The person who created the simplified graph was citing this page.
>One thing is certain: varying the amount of gases absorbed by the ocean due to changes in its average temperature played a minor role in regulating the observed changes in the CO2 content of the atmosphere. The leading actors involved physical, chemical and biological processes in the ocean.
Temperatures did not fall first, causing carbon to fall. You could still argue something ELSE must have caused the carbon to fall (but if you claim this, the burden of proof is on you, and there is no proof of that) but you CANNOT say that falling temperatures CAUSED carbon to fall.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06949
>High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000years before present
>The Antarctic Vostok and EPICA Dome C ice cores have provided a composite record of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels over the past 650,000years1,2,3,4. Here we present results of the lowest 200m of the Dome C ice core, extending the record of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration by two complete glacial cycles to 800,000yr before present.
And this is the actual source of the data.