/sci/ - Science & Math

I mean, look at pic related. OP gets the criticism, "This is wrong." I get the criticism, "No scholarly content."

>>11599249
Your opinion that I didn't post them here>>11597084 is like my opinion that you know I did post them already.

>>11599261
>Infinity/2 is equal to infinity in this sense
I disagree.

>>11599267
>Why doesn't arxiv accept your paper?
You would have to ask them why they do what they do. I don't know why they do it.

>>11599267
>Why don't you submit your Riemann Hypothesis Solution?
I did submit several different versions of it. Arxiv rejected it because it "contained no scholarly content." Note that it wasn't simply wrong or stupid, it was the content was something besides "scholarly."

Anyways... if you look at the rules of Millennium prizes, the waiver they issued to Perelman to give him the money is the same one they would need to issue to me for my publication on viXra. Perelman didn't get his shit peer-reviewed, and he didn't post the solution in any place that conforms to the requirements of the prize. However, the rules also say they can give a waiver if they want to. Even if I did get my paper on arXiv, something which could never happen, ever, then they would still have to issue me the exact same rules waiver as if I had just left my paper on viXra.

And really it's better for my peace of mind if arXiv keeps fucking me over because then when I round them up and exterminate the staff and their families for all the fucking me over they already did, it won't be weird because they did eventually stop fucking me. You know?

You know what's a (((REALLY))) bad idea?
Being an arXiv employee or related to an arXiv employee on the day that the apparatus of violence finally comes to rest in my hand.

>>11257228
The point of arXiv is that everyone in the industry knows that peer-review is a pointless circle jerk, and by posting on arXiv you can speed up the dissemination of your research by a year or more. ArXiv allows people to quickly browse all the new papers published in a specific area of interest on a daily basis without having to go to the 40+ different journal sites where the papers end up, if they ever do ever end up somewhere besides arXiv, which many of them don't.

Also, arXiv has an unpublished set of censorship criteria so they can blacklist anyone they want for any reason. Then when people say, "Wow! If arXiv rejected your paper, you must be a real fucking asshole given the absolute dogshit-tier papers that they publish every day." (Indeed, absolute dogshit gets published on arXiv five days a week and this has been an unbroken streak going back man years!) Then between the well-known blacklisting among the journals, and then the lesser known blacklisting by arXiv which is thought to publish anything but absolutely does not, arXiv acts to retard the progress of science by conforming the political agenda of its censors' masters rather the alleged scientific agenda of Cornell University and the honest scientific agenda of the scientists who use their pre-print service.

>>11164782
I want to tell you it won't be fun later when I torture you and make filthy every single you ever tried to keep clean in your life, but I like the pic you posted so I'm not sure what you're going for there. 4chan is vile and if there were any other venue where I could get feedback on my research without being blacklisted, banned, or shadowbanned, or where that fact is not glaringly obvious to me as my 4chan shadowban might not be, then I would certainly use that venue instead.

...and not only that, this guy with the sort problem only made one stupid ass thread, and the problem he was working on, if it was even real, is completely retarded. On the other hand, I made over 9,000 threads about
>THE MOST IMPORTANT (((UNSOLVED))) PROBLEM IN MATHEMATICS
and you guys on here, sometimes, are like, "Maybe the reason you're not getting the accolade you want because people don't know about your research." If people don't know about it, it's because I'm in a fake internet bubble wherein the agents of the USA Great Satan conspire to hide the Word of God from those whom he would show it to.

arXiv is a piece of shit

>>10689616
>gay NatSec

>>10662880
>Scientific publishing is cucked af

>>10655649
(1) You get the million for publishing, not for solving it so you better not be blacklisted from publishing
(2) not if you're on the shit list
(3) not if you're on the shit list
(4) trudat

>>10625363
I've never been granted peer-review despite the many papers I've sent to many journals.

>>10551407
>toxic towards geniuses?

>>10525597
>https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.11384.pdf

>>10525617