/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6102188
You're as stupid as OP. There is no reason why "justifying/creating things" requires any sort of qualitative experience.

I know that feel and it gets even stronger if I'm excited about something and drinking a hot beverage such as coffee or tea

>>3466777
lol not a strawman, they're actually claiming god must have accelerated the decay rate, that is how they account for it all.

I mean come on bro this is not very good trolling.

>>3310604
Not only that, but god isn't even an explanation at all, because it's a complex entity that requires more explaining. The only way to actually explain the universe is to reduce it down to irreducible components, which clearly a god is not. So by saying "god did it" one has explained PRECISELY NOTHING.

The problem is that we're stuck with this paradox of either:

a. energy always existed for eternity
b. energy came from nothing

These are the only 2 opions and neither really makes sense, however quantum mechanics sort of explains b.

a. is plausible simply because b. seems more implausible

Interesting film
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQ8rd7AkMmY

>>3304366
>infinity is proof of everything

So then it's proof that god doesn't exist!
And proof the flying spaghetti monster exists!
haha, backfire.