/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15298702
For example with the rosenau experiments during the spanish flu.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687
They were unable to get anyone infected with the flu.
Why?
How they injected saliva of sick peole.
Sprayed it in eyes and nose.
Made them breath the air of sick people through muzzles.
Nobody go sick.
How?
why?
why didn't it transmit when specifically tested for it?

They forced them to:
> drink the spit and snot of almost dying sick from spanish flu patient
> get the spit and snot sprayed into eyed and nose
> get the blood injected
> get a snorkel mouth to mouth from soldier to sick patient
> and were forced for 10 minutes to breathe the exhaused air of the sick patient
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4574984

In this journal are multiple attempts to transmit influenza by experiment.
Yet with no success.

Here they walkthrough every attempted transmission experiment until they were unrepeatable because of """ethics"""
https://odysee.com/@DrAndrewKaufman:f/The_End_of_Germ_Theory_by_Spacebusters:b

Please give a source where they proved it.

>unicorns exist
>no you have to prove to me they don't!

>>15294274
Scientific experiment with really simple procedure, a dimwit like you can even understand.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687
During the spanish flu, they just took over 100 soldiers who were healthy.
And did the following.

They forced them to:
> drink the spit and snot of almost dying sick from spanish flu patient
> get the spit and snot sprayed into eyed and nose
> get the blood injected
> get a snorkel mouth to mouth from soldier to sick patient
> and were forced for 10 minutes to breathe the exhaused air of the sick patient

NONE not a single soldier got sick.
How is this possible?

>>15137589
Yet it has been done.
The propose mechanism of transmitting and receiving a disease was thoroughly tested in the most real life way possible.
And this is the way it is claimed to be the standard way of transmission.
> Breathing in the wet air of someone sick
> and getting their droplets

This was done multiple times up until WW2.
And never could any "transmission" be established even when injected mucus of sick people or sprayed in eyes, nose and mouth.

Never.

And then "ethics" came a long, to forbid these kind of trials...
Why?
Maybe because it raised questions to the proposed mechanism.

Kochs Postulates never could be verified...
Meaning they got disproven.
Because it is not possible to fullfill them.
Yet they are deemed as the gold standard of cause and effect for bacteriological and virological disease transmission...
Even though... it does not work.
> no disease equal to the original hosts disease could every be produced by isolating a supsected microorganism or virus

But we know one thing for sure...
Poison is poisoning people.
If you give people mercruy or arsenic, they all will have similar or euqal issues.
> Neuronal poisoning and the symptoms therof
but for some reason...
It is deemed "esotheric" to say that known and declared poisons, are poisoning people...

But its not esotheric, that non scientifically verified microbiological organisms, which constantly surround us, are killing us.
And that our body is at constant and permanent war with them...