/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15749104
Big bugna.

>>15499927
Shock and horror. I was absolutely convinced I was living in the age of true enlightenment, where the priest class really does know the secrets of the universe and people aren't just deluding theselves.

>>15278114
This discussion has no genuine intellectual content. Humans will continue to argue in favor of free will and NPCs will continue to argue against it regardless of any objective points in favor of one or the other, assuming such points exist at all.

Isn't it nice that the irrational zealots show up to illustrate my point?

>>15160214
Slaves do what they do in the name of others, or for the sake of some ideal, or to bring about some future that never actually arrives. Demoralized slaves ask "what's the point?" and look for a pretext to do nothing. Free men do what they do for the sake of the fulfilment they get out of doing it.

>>15138245
>Kant believed
Well, my aunt believed otherwise.

>>14870599
>To start from the ground up, we propose that it should be "Thoughts are being experienced, therfore thoughts exist".
Prove that there are some "thoughts" separates from the "experiencer" first. Otherwise your statement is nonsense.

>>14866027
>What is the biggest most sci fi thing a random dude could do in his garage. Like a diy black hole or something.
Create an AGI and trigger the singularity.

>>14850808
>why should I watch the rest of the video?
>>14850884
>So, later in the video, around 23 minutes, the subject mentions
That video is 30 minutes long. You did watch the rest of the video.

>>14771493
It doesn't take any time to complete an infinite number of purely imaginary "steps". There are no "step" to complete in reality. Motion is continuous. Zeno's paradox is imaginary wank and it's resolved by the imaginary wank of limits.

>everyone knows that Jews are over-represented in media. But so what?
>that doesn't mean they are nepotistic!!
>that's a conspiracy theory!!!!!

I honestly don't know who to side with. On the one hand, most of you are worthless vermit that need to go without question. It is vastly preferable if most of you locusts die off. On the other hand, I'm not going to side with the malevolent pedo cult spreading Malthusian propaganda. They and their ilk need to be slowly tortured to death in public. What a conundrum.

>>14662318
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly_djozCksg

>>14659583
>the human brain sucks at emulating a computer
>a computer sucks at emulating the human brain

>>14514642
>I can't help but notice the high IQ treat us midwits like filth.
Animals are children are probably dumber than you, but I don't feel any compulsion to belittle their intelligence; to the contrary, it excites me when they outdo themselves, even if their intellectual accomplishmets are trivial in the grand scheme of things. Some people (usually midwits) look down upon 60 IQ deep jungle tribesmen for their inability to grasp modern concepts or make technological advancements, but I admire them for their skill and competence in their niche. So here's the thing, anon: I treat you like filth not because you're dumber than me, but because you desperately try to be something you're not (i.e. an intellectual), you overextend yourself, and so you become a circus show of incompetence. You meddle in affairs that are beyond your sphere of competence and make an idiot of yourself, but you are usually oblivious to it. You will incessantly argue with people who are smarter than you, and declare yourself a winner because just you can't understand why you are wrong. Incompetence is disgusting. Lack of self-awareness is disgusting. You're disgusting. It didn't have to be this way, you know? You could stick to things that are within your ability, become actually good at something and gain some respect for it. You could live life as a competent man. You choose to live life as a bumbling retard and an intellectual wannabe, and this turns people off. It's your choice and the treatment you get is 100% on you.

>>11329825
>Japanese scientist reaction
Which was?