/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16133039
>523,000,000 BC
I should not this is my "Genetic Lineage Birth Year", not my "calendar" which has been partially lost to time.

Age of Aquarium of the Great Year (Month), in human years I can assume no more than two full Great Year cycles, but median that for averaging, yields about 35,000-40,000 BC.

Well before the Ice Age, thats just the Information Wall of historical accounting.

The timeline shift, Gobekli Tepi and now earlier finding, they have GEOMTRY.

It existed before written language, I swear, I tasted years ago and I cant find a more logical deduction. And Astronomy, far older.

>>16003232

>>15566728
>disproven
The perspective is the error as that dictates the context of verses, to which historical literalism is nearly the exact opposite was of reading scripture, as that aspect is still important because it keeps the narrative achored in reality, not a made up story. Its metaphorical, or attributed correlation like the zodiac.

Zodiac is quasi-real and not too different from INTP/ENTJ etc types, archtypical narratives, temperments, its all connected tribes and different ways of conceptualizing reality. Humans collated these ideas into groups and and connections, the stars are just a piece of paper in the sky that notss can be drawn on.

You.......do see messages in the stars, right?

>>15372371
>man vs reality is all of those and those unrealized by human-mortals

t.Shadow-Walking Star-Strider

>>15334151
>Pretty much all my "evidence" requires a PhD or two.
Which I usually dont talk about without just stating "this is the answer" because so few people can understand the knowledge needed to connect the dots.

>>15310656
>Note though that different people having different ideas doesn't mean base 10 is unrelated to the fingers
So they went from charting star dates to counting on fingers? I fully understand the point but you keep going back to "fingers" like some autist.

I get it, it alings, but given the field and how robust a study its been in human history? No...thats...not aspie. Thats autist.

>>15298059
>sources have now been shown
Haha
I SAID CREDENTIALS. YOUR'S.

NO, YOU HOLDING UP A FACE AND SAYING "I SAID THE THING, SUBMIT LIKE THE OTHERS."

Oh...and you are no /x/, begone tourist.

>>15289706
>Materialism
Ah, a cultist. Nevermind, I'll keep it "esoteric" and detached from reality.