Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Maintenance is complete! We got more disk space.
Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.10574882 [View]
File: 48 KB, 420x375, 1350587791929.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10574882

Why does mathematics use 0 instead of +0 and -0?

We have no problem thinking of infinity as a number that's constantly expanding, so why isn't zero treated as a number that's constantly collapsing into itself? Why isn't it given a positive or negative sign like other values?

And I understand that the direct answer is "The math checks out", but just because an answer works in mathematics doesn't mean it has to be 100% correct right? Neutral zero being a substitute for positive zero and negative zero might work in certain cases, but in others, such as divided by zero, it does not. Zero might be such a small number that you can essentially say that it is worth nothing, but is that actually correct? Or just a hotfix solution?



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]