/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2319699
1) That isn't scientific, that is a phil. BIG FUCKING DIFFERENCE.

2) This doesn't look like a peer-review published paper. It's value is meaningless (even in the context of phil) without proper peer-review and publication.

Nice try though. It is interesting, I'll give you that. But it isn't science. It does have some neat references on particular scientifc studies, but that is all.

The paper is not science, and jumps to huge fuckin conlusions (just like you), based off a few studies. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Discuss...