/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15314892

First of all your chart is manipulated.
The case rate is very of from what I can observe.

Secondly.
From the 1900s-1960s it was very prevalent to spray down children with:
>DDT
>Arsenic (Lead arsenate or paris green)
to "delice them".

So you have a environmental toxin at play.
Toxic skin reactions to Arsenic are known.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/article-abstract/522495

https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA20785135_25733

https://journals.lww.com/epidem/Fulltext/2000/07000/DDT_EXPOSURE_AND_HEALTH_EFFECTS_IN_A_COMMUNITY.130.aspx

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/paris-green

https://www.invasiveplantswesternusa.org/history-of-use-of-herbicides-and-pesticides-prior-to-and-during-wwii.html

So the stopping of usage of DDT and Arsenic pesticides coincide with the deployment of the vaccine.
Also It is very easy to "conceal" measels. Because it is non Pathognomonic different from Mumps, Rubella, Scarlet fever.

So doctor goes: "if kid got rash, and is not vaxxed and has rash, must be measels. If kid vaxxed it must be [insert indistinguishable disease]"

[math]
\begin{equation}
\text{Child has rash}=\begin{cases}
Measels , & \text{child is not or incompletly vaxxed}.
\\
\\
Erythema+Fever , & \text{if child is vaxxed}.
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
[/math]