/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7974968
>‘Bottom line: the ‘no upward trend’ has to continue for a total of 15 years before we get worried.’
If only you and the rest of the denier crowd had bothered to read the next sentence...
>We're really counting this from about 2004/5 and not 1998. 1998 was warm due to the El Nino.

>>7974973
>give some very specific numbers!
>makes vague references to big scary error bars, no actual numbers in sight

>cooling for a long time (roughly 1945 to 1965)
actually a slight warming trend from '45 to '65, you imbecile. (pic related) don't quit your day job...