/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4794171
>>4794158
>'is light a particle or a wave'

the worst fucking thread of the month

>>4421945
Good answer

>>3276229
You are so smart for believing in facts like man-made global warming! Please impregnate us OP!

>>3234447
\thread

>>2235492
HOW MAY WE SERVE YOU?????????????????????????

>>1806873
That goes for the American public as well. Enginnering is not a science, nor is it particularly difficult. It is akin to plumbing or fastfood worker.

There are no curves in nature. There are only straight lines and gravity.

>>1727843
>Someone said that when they calculate decay rates, they use the frame of reference as if the particle was at zero kelvin

Lol, no they didn't say that. Tempteure is not a "reference frame". They said the particle had zero momemtum. Your problem is that you keep relating mometum of a single particle to temperture. Why do you keep doing this?

If I have a single particle (or few), I cannot define the temperture of this particle. Tempeture is a "statistaical measure" involving a "volume", not a "actual measure" or "property of a particle". A individual particle has no temperature, no matter what its momentum is.

Time Dilation really has nothing to do with temperature. Time dilation involves moving "reference frames", temperature is a stat measure related to the average mometum of partciles within a given volume.

>>1003968
>The whole idea of morals is just a very crude form of mind control.

WE HAVE A WINNER!
Unzip your pants and take your prize!

>>938040
Thanks for the info physics guy
pic just for you