[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15130233 [View]
File: 57 KB, 2365x1441, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15130233

>>15128708
>space AND time are bent
That's the difference. My explanation simplifies things. There is no reason to consider time except that objects moving faster through space move slower through time.
Spacetime isn't a thing. There's just space that moves around (toward matter) and that movement of space past us influences how we perceive time.
I am offering a simplified model compared to what GR offers. Simpler is better.
We can eliminate gravitational time dilation, which is really just kinetic. We can eliminate mediating particles like the graviton.

Also think about the possibilities of where this could lead. If space goes into matter, where does it go? To some "other place" one would assume.
But the universe is expanding, not contracting, so space must come back some how. Perhaps antimatter is the opposite, as in space comes out of it.
I think the boundary between our universe and the "other place" is porous. Space drains out of the universe through large clumps of matter (planets, stars etc..) and seeps back in through uniformly distributed antimatter particles.

What do you think?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]