/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11089623
>the groups he works with don't automatically have such structures assumed onto them
Imagine being a mathtard baby who has to be handheld and told when he can and can't have a topology defined on his set. Looks like physicschad win again.
>NOOOO REE MOMMY NEVER SAID I COULD DEFINE A MANIFOLD STRUCTURE ON SU(2), YOU CAN'T TALK ABOUT PATH CONNECTEDNESS REEE
>DID YOU JUST ASSUME MY TOPOLOGY? WHAT IF MY GROUP IDENTIFIES AS A DISCRETE TOPOLOGICAL SPACE? REEEE
Cope.

>>11080125
>europoor standards
Hahaha