/sci/ - Science & Math

there is no such thing as true randomness, merely the existence of a sufficiently complex process. to explain away quantum mechanics as a truly random act, due to our inability to comprehend the complexities of the process, is an offense no better and no more respectable than philosophers of the past blaming the unpredictability of lightning and earthquakes on the wrath of gods.

to say it is truly random, because our methods for measuring such things say it to be so, means little more than that our methods are insufficient and need to be improved.

if you disagree with me, you're a faggot.

refuse to mention or reference the work of Ancient Egypt in their work?

I'm not trying to say they were racist so don't >pol> me or anything, i just find it odd that you don't reference the civilization that invented science, that of Egypt. Why did these prominant physicists refuse to do that?

why didn't the brilliant physicists of the solvay conference reference the work of Ancient Egypt/Kemet...did they not realize their entire science was based on Kemetic knowledge?

>>11498032
only a few chadlites come to mind like feynman and shannon. i really can't think of a pure chad. and sure einstein did slay but he probably was deep in 6s, not stacys.

>>11253569
you can't be intelligent if your brain isn't optimally developed. Hollywood nerd guy archetype is very far from reality and online iq tests aren't a very good measurement of intelligence. do you see any nerd archetype guy or poorly developed man in this pic? no? hell even genius women had prominent jaws and eyebrow ridge.
of course outliers exist but i am speaking of the general picture

is it true that they spend a whole session praising Egyptian mathematics and science

ancient egypt to them was the crucible of scientific knowledge

so why didn't these guys listen to the speech? get the memo?

>>10482326

Watch this picture closely for some of the modicums we provide as a sense of the listened and the speaker that we are in essence teeming to one. That sense there is that we can by all means procure a gesture of efficiency to each other as a general mean for our posture and composure, in a limited supply (SUP GIRL IF YOU GOT IT OMG BE GAY IDC), so that by general efficiencies and means we will not be gay and that by that you will encounter that we have no encountered ourselves in another time, it's that by dimensions we encounter the fault and that the criminal is in behavior a suit for revenge and retaliation we must by this accord and all accounts afford ourselves the "responsibility" to consume ALL proper variables to within our means until the appropriate time is vestige. As in yours or mine as part of our actual regiment or our degree.It's a fucking fool hardy approach but the method is not a Galois for function. It's a galois as his observations or a menage of the totality for observation and that then we reside in the squares for resignation, we are the only people in culpable straits that will have this math until we reach the calculus of Euler and Liebnitz and possibly Mochizuki if you wanna get bored because we're rich because that is how we make ourselves useful. To this math. Not corporate status or law-like mathematical inquiry. It is exciting because I can move the wind too. CHECK IT OUT.

Why were scientists in the past dressing so much more fashionably compared to modern times? All these guys have tailored suits and look fit for their age.

i mean the greatest scientists of the 20th century, were all black men

i mean just look at this pic
oh wait......

did they know about Isaac Newton

is it true that knowledge of Newton wasn't really well known until about the 1950s and 60s

do you think Einstein and the other people here knew who Newton was?

did they know about Isaac Newton, were they aware of him

i read somewhere that he wasn't well known until the 1960s in the scientific community

look towards Ancient Africa for wisdom

this is not a /pol thread or some attempt to troll, I am being serious, why didn't they ever look back to some african societies in the past for knowledge and wisdom

refuse to look to ancient egypt for wisdom on science

did they simply lack knowledge of what egypt was

did they know about Isaac Newton, were they aware of him


or was Newton not really known until later that century?

that the physicists of the Solvay Conference in 1927 made up General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics to make themselves feel better, because they were insecure about Ancient Egyptian achievement in science?

Can /sci/ name them all without looking it up?

I read somewhere that many of the 20th century White European scientists were jealous of Ancient Egyptian science, that they made up General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics to make themselves feel special

is this true?

That the solvay conference was held in 1927...because the European scientists pictured here, were jealous of the achievements of Ancient Egypt that their science wasn't as advanced

Out of this famous picture at the 1927 Slovak conference. We all know these guys were jealous of ancient Egyptian science makes you wonder how many were racists