/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9429068
>but u a cunt
As Stefan Molyneux would say: "Not an argument".
>was gna give u benefit of doubt
Who cares? I'm using actual sociological sources that prove everything I'm saying, and using good deductive reasoning to argue why every man should have access to a woman - to stop infighting, which creates MASSIVE productivity, and you're just slinging personal insults.

You haven't made a SINGLE argument about how giving women the right to dictate through vote how society is ran (which they'll vote according to their biological imperative), giving them resources through law that a man would have traditionally provided, and allowing them to form harems is at all in ANY way beneficial to civilization.

Have you at all considered why it is that year after year the average IQ in Western civilizations has DECREASED and is projected to ONLY DECREASE seemingly INFINITELY, because women prefer to mate on an INSTINCTUAL level with low IQ thuggish brutes (a.k.a. bad boys), and when given the choice will not mate with intelligent men (a.k.a nice guys), will send us right back to the stone ages? You are advocating for a system of sexual selection which intentionally removes intelligence from the gene pool. Go on, make an argument about how that is a good thing.

I implore you, make a single pragmatic argument that isn't just >muh equality, about how any of this is beneficial for the survival of humanity?