/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5730857
1/Z = (Z1+Z2)/Z1Z2
no.

Z1=Z2/Z1Z2
Z2=Z1/Z1Z2
Redistribute your perameters and make that inacurate to simplify to the x -> y

>>5730861
>especially if Z equals zero
>

>>5679964

>>5604181
No man the point is that there is always equal reason to put yourself one way or the other so just be with the nature of it and position yourself with both or neither

>>5596734
It looks suspiciously like a quantification of 0.00..001 with ranging implications...

>>5587084
See now that's a plausible premise

Assuming it printed to some holographic material as well correct?

>mfw when birds gone

Wow this might actually cause the world to switch to a different base number system....

Hail Anonymous

>>5469489
Yes but how can that be applied when it is as said the 'Muadib Phenomenon' theres even a third basis of construction that gives them all premise of utility to the singularity- which defeats the seperate dimension of time as it is not behaving as a linear subject(*), as to say that between the aggregate and the subject that there is an unconsidered operation
Whats being said there is that infinity^infinity
But what I'm saying is that before they can even recognize its even intrinsic self as such does it(... why the fuck are powers written like that? /sci/ help?) need to recognize there is an expanse beyond it as to say that even before it is infinity it is percieving infinity and does the external boundaries comply- which is the question of how that phenomina is occuring, is it breaking a path into said objective external or is it behaving as the external
>implying Muadib is the force progressing existance
But now we know that cant be true because animalia and reptiles history & shiz
So yes, it is like freezing the framework to that, but just as so, that the in question operation is not foolproof<-being the ideal term
>*?nextpost
+1 on taste btw OP