/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11584690
>"this continues endlessly"
Oh, but you previously claimed:
>"Numbers are not processes"
hurr durr, indeed. What is it like to be a retarded midwit, anon?

>>11375881
>communal discussion
>posts 10 replies in a row

I've heard that he doesn't agree with the current explanation of real numbers, and that he deconstructs the currently accepted system of mathematics, but what has he actually done.
I've also heard of his trigonometry book "Divine Proportions", but I have never read it. Anyone read it before?

>>10895934
shes married

btw thats me in the image.

>>10745379
To waste your lives feeling so certain of a thing, only to see it dismantled from the inside out...
Now, suddenly, the rug has been pulled from under the feet of you dreamers. I can imagine how lonely you must feel deep down inside, bearing such pain.
That is the beauty, that is the terror of mathematics. There's no getting around a proof.
Don't blame yourselves; instead, blame history, and the human spirit. To whet mankind's thirst for knowledge, history gave us Galileo, Newton, Darwin, Einstein, Godel, and now Wildberger gets his turn.
You must either move on, or get left behind. The choice is yours.

>>10686720
Not Euro, Aussie (UNSW).

CS:
https://www.handbook.unsw.edu.au/undergraduate/programs/2019/3778

EE:
https://www.handbook.unsw.edu.au/undergraduate/specialisations/2019/elecah

Post your favorite lectures and videos under the Three Categories.

1. Popular (Meal time videos)
> Royal Institution Science Videos
> PBS Science channels: Infinity/Geology/Quantum Mechanics
> Jim Al-Khalili / Brian Cox / Marcus du Sautoy

2. Classroom Lectures
> N J Wilderberger for Maths
> Robert Sapolsky for Neuroscience

3. Specialized Subtopics
>

4. General/Historical
> Feynman Interviews
> Roy Lisker on meeting Alexander Grothendieck

No LARPing Youtubers.

>>10470025

>>10466235
the second one

>>10444253
>Pic is related to the text

Its not.

>>10415491
The obvious answer is that the reals do not exist, and neither a solution.

>>9728174
>numbers

Is it true?

> Why more physics can help achieving better mathematics
https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07735

In this paper, we discuss the question whether a physical "simplification" of a model makes it always easier to study, at least from a mathematical and numerical point of view. To this end, we give different examples showing that these simplifications often lead to worse mathematical properties of the solution to the model. This may affect the existence and uniqueness of solutions as well as their numerical approximability and other qualitative properties. In the first part, we consider examples where the addition of a higher-order term or stochastic noise leads to better mathematical results, whereas in the second part, we focus on examples showing that also nonlocal models can often be seen as physically more exact models as they have a close connection to higher-order modeIs.

>>9082043
>Bourbaki
>every topic

How do we solve the /pol/ bogeyman problem?

>>9045463
I know some people on /sci/ meme about infinite sets not being real cause of Wildburger, but are we now doubting induction too? It works for finite sets if you happen to think 2^1000 is the biggest number or whatever

*enters your finite thread, which will never even have more than 10^1000 posts*

>>8907691
The new seminar on 5 point symmetry is amazing

>>8810418

Is that all you got cuck? Polynomials are the foundations of circular functions, and calculations of e^x.

Combine this method with rational trig and youve made a lot of the fundamental difficulties with mathematics obsolete for 99% of people who get exposed to them.