/sci/ - Science & Math

>Why isn't there a quantum gravitational theory?

There is one. It's just that the person who developed it, yours truly, is on the government's shit list and they figured it would look better in the history books if they just ignored it for like 10 years than if they told the truth about me.
>Quantum Gravity
>http://vixra.org/abs/1506.0055

Above is just a short paper but since then I have written a much longer book about the the model in which I derived a mechanism for quantum gravity.
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
MIRROR 1: http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
MIRROR 2: http://2occatl.net/1712.0598v2.pdf
MIRROR 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXrFZhMo9OjoauL0SgAvpSxD_8qaAYi0/view?usp=sharing

>>9529459
yeah I do. you can do see-through face on me and Guido Fox too.

>>9529299

>>9451951
I was more unhappy when I had to get cucked at that job everyday. And before I could ever call myself happy, you guys would need to praise me by name for my many great accomplishments.

>>9444377
oh?

Well it can't be the Riemann hypothesis because I disproved it last year.

>On The Riemann Zeta Function
>http://vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

>>9440126
You will rue the day.

Really makes you think is my meme from the Benghazi video.

>Who edited the talking points? (Benghazi?)
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q18hXaE-FpU
Also, everything relevant about evolution is in my paper

>The Truth About Evolution
>http://vixra.org/abs/1602.0132

[math]137\approx2\pi+(\Phi\pi)^3[/math]

Whenever I make this post about this value for the fine structure constant I get lots of "dat numerlogie" criticism and people tell me I'm stupid because the value of the fine structure constant measured in the Josephson junction experiment has like... a dozen sig figs.

However... there are plenty of axiomatic choices applied before the Josephson junction experiment begins so the 0.4% discrepancy between the measured value in the Josephson junction and my theoretical is no big deal.

Furthermore... no one gives a fuck about the Josephson junction experiment. The fine structure constant is important because we can do perturbative QED with power series of the fine structure constant which will give amplitudes that agree with experiment. Even furthermore, the experiments are tuned to match the prediction so that is another layer that makes the number of significant digits in the empirical value not totally relevant.

You can use any number near 1/137 as the expansion parameter in perturbative QED and it will give verifiable correct amplitudes. However, no one ever says (besides me) the real importance of the fine structure constant is in perturabative QED, not the Josephson junction experiment which produces a histogram in an oscilloscope which is then used to construct some spline function that gives a value of the fine structure constant about 0.4% away from the value I derived.

EVEN AFTER YOU PULL A NUMBER FROM THE OSCILOSCOPE'S HISTOGRAM AND DO A CALCULATION IN QED, THE EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEMATICS WILL BE TUNED TO WHATEVER THE NUMBER WAS... THE EMPIRICAL NUMBER OR THE THEORETICAL NUMBER I PRODUCED.