[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.6441191 [View]
File: 340 KB, 793x688, 1373812783342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6441191

>This is the level of chemistry on /sci/

>> No.6037166 [View]
File: 340 KB, 793x688, 1373812783342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6037166

>>6037128
One of the quantum postulates states that there exists an expectation value for any operator that corresponds to the average value that will be measure for a measurable quantity. Meaning there are different, discrete values that you will over time you will end up measuring at a certain ratio based on their probability. How the hell is that random? Sure, one single, isolated measurement might appear random. Nobody, however, is claiming that LOL THINGS HAPPEN AT RANDOM!

Particles have properties that have no physical analogue on our level of experience. We have useful models, but we also understand that they have limitations and a paradigm shift could come at any time. Anyone who claims that we have near a full picture is obviously not a mature member of the scientific community. You're arguing things that sophomore level STEM students and armchair nerds would claim.

In other words no.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]