/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8110485
>>You'd be able to remember the future as well as the past.
>What ? Why ?
Read my post before replying.
It's because if physics were time-reversible (like Newtonian-Brownian motion), there would be no "arrow of time", no reason for cause to always lie in the past and effect in the future.

>We should embrace an hypothesis because...
QM is not a hypothesis.

>I want to buy a dog, but i don't know if i should buy a male to suck his dick and be sodomised, or a female for just fucking. Any advice ?
It's hard to say based on just one post, but you sound like a cocksucker to me.