/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10962854
I think that the described phenomena of general relativity and special relativity can both be explained differently. Instead of curvature of spacetime, the same effects of gravitational lensing and time dilation can be predicted by a fluid lattice of harmonic oscillators, a rarefied intermediate phase state of hydrogen, the aether, orienting to equilibrium states of pressure mediation and conservation of momentum. Such ethereal oscillators can be thought to have a period of oscillation that elongates in the mediation of pressure along the axis of rotation. This elongation of the period of oscillation corresponds to a decrease in the rate of radioactive decay, merely as a conservation of momentum, explaining the time dilation observed in atomic clocks. The electromagnetic field and the gravitational field can be described as corresponding to actions of these oscillators along different axis, gravity being a transference of momentum in parallel with the axis of rotation, and electromagnetism perpendicular to that axis of rotation.

>>10961224
Spacetime curvature
>nothing to see here, move along

Yeah but something currently indistinguishable from space, as we have defined it by the qualities of permittivity and permeability, is capable of *effecting physical objects in (approximately) the way that relativity posits. Special Relativity is just Lorentz Local Time, with some added jargon.

>>10933011
Each cell is a rotating surface of charge, a convection current of energy, a vortex, and it has angular momentum, and it is doing pretty much exactly this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n-HMSCDYtM
Please respond Uwu