/sci/ - Science & Math

>
Ergo, if you are flipping burgers, and are getting paid by the hour, you are getting fucked over. You Ought to be getting a cut of the profits made from the burgers, or perhaps even a certain amount of burgers themselves after a particular period of time (should you decided you wanted the burgers themselves rather than the money from their sale.

>>3079372
>As soon as you are all working class citizens EARNING your cash instead of it being spoon fed to you, you'll understand.

Your tears are delicious

>>2955638
Probably could but why would you want to maintain a system which benefits an increasingly smaller group of people at the cost of everyone else?

By the way this pic is very related to this thread.

>>2746745

I support this

I find it hilarious how the capitalists have been able to turn the working class against itself, by somehow making workers jealous of unemployed and hobos.

This shit needs to stop. The worlds' industrial might could give everyone a middle class, first world living standard if most of the profit wasn't salted into the bank accounts of the super-rich.

Do you really think you will break into the ranks of the worlds' owners? By working hard?

The worlds' hardest workers, in east-asian sweatshops, have a miserable, squalid existence to show for it.

However, if you are born rich you will never have to do a day's work in your life.

If it's wealth you're after, here is a useful guide in comic form.

Getting rich off the work of others is the greatest.

Previous OP deleted his thread a while ago. It was about how bloodsucking capitalists are taking 60-90% of the value off the blood and sweat of proletariat.

It turns out , that for USA amounts taxable by capital gain tax are 5% of the GDP. Doesn't it mean, that fuck it - 5% is nothing. Taking 5% is not fucking bloodsucking! It's not even a big deal.

Did I get something wrong? Are there some other numbers?

>>2597224

Basically this in a nutshell. Try as we might, it will require massive will power to change things. Too bad most are idiots and are conditioned to love their masters.

>>2549662

This picture will explain all. Everyone's doing it.

>>2545152

Lend your money out to the guy in the suit and wait for the fruits of exploitation to roll in

>>2502404

I'm sure a capitalist can produce goods on his own.

Face it, having lots of money is not a good reason to be given more. Quite the opposite.

Co-operative enterprises are companies run by their employees. There are no shareholders except them - everyone gets one, non-transferrable share. This means that all the profit not kept for expansion capital goes to the employees (who actually do the work).

Decisions are made democratically in an assembly. A facilitator keeps order while people say their pieces, and people then vote on the proposition.

How does /sci/ feel about this? Will we see more of them in the West with the current recession? Inb4 hurrdurr socialism is evil.

Funnelling the profits of companies mainly to investors rather than workers is inherently unfair and promotes inequality, selfishness and greed.

How does sci feel about this?

Syndicalist btw.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/fox-nation-readers-confuse-onion-article-real-news/

ITT: fox news is entirely composed of retards. Discuss.

nothing ever changes

discuss

Why do we still use this system?

Image 20 out of 134.1349409