/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14549728
>Of course they've got until 2025
Maybe even sooner, there's talk of at least one private mission for a tiny rover to land near and to visit the Apollo 17 landing site, to photograph and film the rover and LEM descent stage. (Because the GRAIL/LCROSS orbital pics aren't gonna cut it for most)

If that happens especially before Artemis III then all the moon hoaxers will get BTFO, all depends on the success of CLPS right now (Commercial Lunar Payload Services) missions paving the way, first launches this or next year hopefully.

>>9556903
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2adl6LszcE&t=1s

Look at the regolith they kick up when they fall over, its actually proof it was filmed on the moon because it wouldn't behave that way on Earth it does on the moon because of the lower gravity

Its the same with video showing the lunar rover driving on the surface, kicking up regolith in a pattern and trajectory not possible anywhere on Earth.