/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12462484
But the video doesn't say anything about nuclear power.

When will we see sn8's f8 and s8 in action?

>can you cite studies that back your position while I contribute absolutely nothing to the conversation but my own knowledge?

I have a very high Verbal IQ of 134-140 but all my visual spacial/Mathematical IQ is a paltry 112.

Is there some way I could rephrase the math that I'm learning to rely primarily on my Verbal IQ? I really like math and I dont want to go the rest of my life as a mathlet.

I have a verbal IQ of 133-139 but my working memory is 84 and my processing speed is in the 90's.

I honestly dont know if I'm smart or retarded.

>>11254126
huh?

>>11243673
What did he ask?

>>11176310
wtf is scientism?

>>11168440
What Shuttle heritage?

Is film cooling really as simple as having a ring of straight (shower head) injectors that are right on the chamber wall? Or is there some more advanced to their design that I'm missing?

Heat is just kinetic energy of atoms, but i feel warmth under the sun eventho photons have no mass. So how do photons cause the atoms in my skin to gain kinetic energy?

>>10771002
What the fuck is that

I don't understand how quantum superposition is possible.

Something is either on or off, there or not there, saying it's both until it's observed is fucking dumb. It's like saying your piss is both yellow and clear at the same time until you look in the toilet. It's not actually both at any time, you just don't know which it is until you look, which isn't the same thing. How can something be in two different places, at two different energy levels simultaneously?

Scientifically speaking, why is /lit/ so much more intelligent than /sci/?