/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3626089
you don't know what he is talking about, but still need to feel Superior... if your want to nitpick on spelling >>>/lit/ is a much better place

>>3577897
>implying you have any clue you knew what he was talking about
>implying km/h is the SI standard unit (pro tip its m/s)

he was saying that kg*m/s is the same as kg*m/s

>>2852562

I'll probably smash my wall in when I watch the whole debate. My curiosity is staving off my raging fucks in my head.

"Where is the evidence? :)" will be in my fucking nightmares.

>>2138462
yes it is.

I never said "herp derp lets haphazardly rearange the genes and live forever!" I was trying to illustrate that we could put the more important genes in the safe place and the less important genes in the less safe place. its like why we have our brain in our skull and not in our feet.

you are just saying that we dont know what they do, I get it. but just because we don't know doesn't mean we cant
A. try it in labs on simple organisms
B. findout and then do it
C. guess it right the first time based on what we do know

>>2037289

Christ, why are you people even still talking about "the big crunch"? That was disproved ages ago. Universe is flat; heat death is where it's at.

>>1608757

>>1528127

Who the fuck spams /sci/? Creationists? ... actual scientists?