[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12789387 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, 1593043823816.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12789387

>>12789374
>boeing

>> No.12409363 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12409363

>>12409347
No refunds. If you actually want it to fly that'll cost another 5 Billion btw.

>> No.12262074 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12262074

Senator Shelby, the time has come. Initiate nationalization order 66.

>> No.12090110 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12090110

>>12090059
>Oh you actually want SLS to fly?
>That'll cost you another 2 billion

>> No.12060881 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12060881

>>12060872
You need a stage adapter? that'll be $20 billion + all the FH internal data.

>> No.11967461 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11967461

>>11967388
Senator Shelby. The time has come... execute nationalization order 66.

>> No.11834009 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11834009

>following the Agency’s April 30 decision, leaders of the Committee reiterated their concerns and expressed disappointment in NASA’s deviation from Congressional intent with bill H.R. 5666
>congress had directed NASA to place more focus on sending humans to Mars than on returning to the Moon, to delay sending a crewed mission to the Moon until 2028, and to have full ownership of the lunar lander, instead of buying those services from a private company amd deemphasized many of the scientific plans related to lunar missions that are seen as vital to NASA, including making use of lunar ice at the Moon, and it sought to restrict the development of a “continuously crewed lunar outpost or research station”
>the CLPS initiative has the legislators’ approval, but they also direct NASA to use lunar landers that operate using the Space Launch System
>curiously significant because all three cosponsors of H.R. 5666 receive thousands of dollars in campaign funding from a Boeing-associated PAC each campaign cycle
>Upon closer look, it is not the fact that NASA is partnering with private companies that seems to bother original cosponsors of this bill; instead, the opposition stems from the way in which NASA is doing it and who the Agency is doing it with.
Big YIKES.

>> No.11798349 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, 1590247521280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11798349

>>11798335
They're old tech and not efficient compared to other crew modules

>> No.11749466 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11749466

It's nationalization then...

>> No.11703483 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11703483

>>11703476

>> No.11690068 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11690068

>>11689902
Way too close to the launch date for this to happen now.

Either he's quit because he has concerns over crew dragon or ((someones)) forced him out..

>> No.11682703 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, dark lord of the slsth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11682703

DAMN YOU DARTH BOING

>> No.11673654 [View]
File: 34 KB, 878x489, Dark lord of the contractors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11673654

>>11673149
Boeing are going to delay as long as possible to compensate losing out on the lander contract expect delays to 2023 as they re-structure to compete with Elon and Bezos, calling it now.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]