/sci/ - Science & Math

>mfw labview

2^x = 3^x
take log of both sides.
x(ln 2) = x(ln 3)
x/x = ln (1)
1=0?

no, but algebra is primitive.
any real mathematician understands that the real world is consistent, so math must also be modeled to be consistent.

also, never work on both sides like I did above.

how old is this again? also,
these are not THE 10 dimensions. they are SOME dimensions, imagined up by some guy.


there is no absolute set of dimensions. in a slice of cake, some dimensions could be flour, egg, sugar, and milk. in space, the first three or four dimensions could all be set at 90degrees from each other, and we can also imagine, but not see, the first three spacial dimensions set at 89 degrees from eachother.

Stranger: Want to see my penis?
CleverBot: Yes.
Stranger: http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/8079/41702645.jpg
CleverBot: Ooh. I like pizza too.

thanks for giving us a problem that only the cautious will solve successfully, because the entire setup is obsolete in form and any sane mathematician would use proper expression syntax with formatted fractions, exponents and brackets.

People still think embryos have to die for stem cells?

Humans have 2 values.
True and false, or
This exists and this doesn't exist.
These are standard human elements that are very basic and simple.

What is something that is not existing but not, not existing?

See what I mean. You cant fathom it. You constantly work with 2 values in your daily life.

Do you "scientists" really think that the simple human mind is ever going to fathom the origin of the universe with such a basic fundamental brain structure?

No. It is impossible. Lets say somebody used some super advanced ray beam to find out the exact atom that started EVERYTHING. The only thing you can claim is that "It exists." You cant do anything else with that information. Is the fact that, that one atom exists, prove anything? Even if it did prove something. That proven object can only be true or false also. You cant get anywhere with just that information. Lets say we used some super technology and that one atom had extraordinary evidence of the construction of the universe from a big bang. Now we know that the big bang existed. Ok. It happened and its true. Its just true. A human data value. That doesn't explain the origin of the universe.

I could even go further and ask "what made the big bang true?" which would lead to more true and false questions.

your heart would have to double in size and power
someone would have to frankenstein your legs, massive work on new veins and arteries would have to be done.
massive tissue reconstruction to fit gator neck muscles onto your tissue
plus the risk of your body rejecting not just the tissue, but also the fact the gators are cold-blooded.

would need both a miracle and a catastrophe of science to achieve what you are proposing.

>buy used book
>somebody cummed in the pages

i hate faggots like you who pretend to be disappointed in their score when they know damn well it's high in effect using an excuse to tell me your fucking test score as if i'll be impressed

>girl
>on 4chan
>on /sci/ of all boards

i don't think so. stop getting trolled.

2) X+(X+1)+(X+2)+(X+3)+(X+4)=94

> i read a book/played a video game/did homework
>i'm such a nerd

square both sides

>>2408215

this is some big bang theory level shit

this is my serious face.

>>1633840
watch the news

>>1628199
You have serious brain damage.

May I direct you to some lol, teenagers thinking they know shit.

Everyone in this thread is completely bullshiting.

>>>/r9k/9965377

ITT arguments with parents

>Mom, you can't possibly think that creationist are right.
>Well son you can't disprove it, now can you? I mean "science" doesn't know how dead matter evolves into life so it must be wrong. Also life is so complex and wonderful to my eyes, god must have made it.
>Mother counters every argument with "you can't disrupt my believe." "Science can't be right because -stereotype argument-"
>myface