/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11907290
Tarot is synchronic, it "aims at describing a language at a specific point of time, usually the present." It aims at describing the order of objects, which is the relation between all oscillating systems in the cosmos, from heartbeats to the eternal objects contained within the Godhead. As above, so below. There is no simultaneous occurrence of meaningful events, but an event which describes the occurrence of meaningful events. Tarot is one of the best representations of our system Logos. I consider Tarot itself to be a refinement of mythologies, which are also synchronic. Studying them is an excellent practice, drawing them is just too profane for my liking. It's not cosmic sexy.

Using Tarot for divination is an attempt to strategize seduction. It pulls the divine into an objective framework then draws a causal contract, which extinguishes divine light in order to extract meaning. I consider synchronicity to be a liberation of divine light which shares meaning. It is romance and intimacy manifested into bodies which represent it to itself. Divination is sex manifested through bodies, which may represent a romance and intimacy not of itself.

>What more is there to say? Nothing is closer to this delicious, vertiginous, insoluble sensation of being the decisive element in some situation without willing it, than pleasing someone with a single glance. A tiny cause, an extraordinary effect: it’s the only proof we have of the existence of God. Incalculable connections are the stuff of our dreams, but also of our daily bread. We like nothing more than this crazy imbalance of cause and effect - it opens fabulous horizons on our origins and on our potential power. They say that seduction is a strategy. Nothing could be more wrong. Seduction is a matter of these unexpected connections that any strategy can at best only attempt to reproduce. (Baudrillard).

Scrying a crystal ball attempts sympathetic resonance between intuition and the medium.