/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9112539

The Japanese Meteorological Agency believed in Global Cooling.

>>8589033
> The rapid response team member, "Bob Basement Boy" told me to get to /sci/ and start the ad hominem as fast as possible.
>Do I need to continue blowing you the FUCK out using your own """sources""" or will you give up again and run away, just like last time?
> Geographers don't count!!!!! So climate change is TRUE!

Clearly cartoonists turned psychologists count. As your fraudulent buddy shows:
> https://www.skepticalscience.com/What-1970s-science-said-about-global-cooling.html
Yeah, I posted a link to one of your fraudsters. And you posted a paper authored by a guy CONNOLLY, who was KICKED OFF WIKIPEDIA for his demagoguery. You probably admire him. But do you really expect me to take you seriously?

>>8539588
>>Global cooling
>http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1
>https://skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s-intermediate.htm
>>8540068
Utterly False
NEEDS, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. "LAWRENCE UVERMORE LABORATORY." (1972). "Global cooling of natural origin could exceed in magnitude changes experienced in historical times.

Potter, Gerald L., et al. "Possible climatic impact of tropical deforestation." (1975): 697-698.

Kukla, George J., and Robert K. Matthews. "When will the present interglacial end?." Science 178.4057 (1972): 190-202.

Gribbin, John. "Cause and effects of global cooling." Nature 254 (1975): 14.


Lamb, H. H. "Changes of climate." Wright & Moseley (1975): 169-188.

Fletcher, Joseph O. MANAGING CLIMATE RESOURCES. No. RAND-P-4000. RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA, 1969. "We may already be inadvertantly influencing global climate. ... a weakening circulation, southward shifts of ice boundary..."

Braslau, Norman, and J. V. Dave. "Effect of aerosols on the transfer of solar energy through realistic model atmospheres. Part I: Non-absorbing aerosols." Journal of applied meteorology 12.4 (1973): 601-615.

Bray, J. R. "Climatic change and atmospheric pollution." Proceedings (New Zealand Ecological Society). New Zealand Ecological Society (Inc.), 1971. Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide content was concluded to have Had An Ambiguous Climatic Influence and may be less important than sometimes considered. Several studies have suggested increased turbidity has produced a recent global cooling trend.

Carter, L. J. 1970. The global environment: M.I.T. study looks for danger signs. Science 169: 660-662. Increased turbidity causes gobal cooling.

Lamb, H. H. 1969. Activite volcanique et climat. Revue de Geographie Physique et de Geologie Dynamique 11: 363-380.

>>8526630
>>8528517
NEEDS, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. "LAWRENCE UVERMORE LABORATORY." (1972). "Global cooling of natural origin could exceed in magnitude changes experienced in historical times.

Potter, Gerald L., et al. "Possible climatic impact of tropical deforestation." (1975): 697-698.

Kukla, George J., and Robert K. Matthews. "When will the present interglacial end?." Science 178.4057 (1972): 190-202.

Gribbin, John. "Cause and effects of global cooling." Nature 254 (1975): 14.


Lamb, H. H. "Changes of climate." Wright & Moseley (1975): 169-188.

Fletcher, Joseph O. MANAGING CLIMATE RESOURCES. No. RAND-P-4000. RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA, 1969. "We may already be inadvertantly influencing global climate. ... a weakening circulation, southward shifts of ice boundary..."

Braslau, Norman, and J. V. Dave. "Effect of aerosols on the transfer of solar energy through realistic model atmospheres. Part I: Non-absorbing aerosols." Journal of applied meteorology 12.4 (1973): 601-615.

Bray, J. R. "Climatic change and atmospheric pollution." Proceedings (New Zealand Ecological Society). New Zealand Ecological Society (Inc.), 1971. Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide content was concluded to have Had An Ambiguous Climatic Influence and may be less important than sometimes considered. Several studies have suggested increased turbidity has produced a recent global cooling trend.

Carter, L. J. 1970. The global environment: M.I.T. study looks for danger signs. Science 169: 660-662. Increased turbidity causes gobal cooling.

Lamb, H. H. 1969. Activite volcanique et climat. Revue de Geographie Physique et de Geologie Dynamique 11: 363-380.

>>8366779
Utterly False
http://notrickszone.com/2016/09/13/massive-cover-up-exposed-285-papers-from-1960s-80s-reveal-robust-global-cooling-scientific-consensus/
>>8366813
>>8366815
>>8366816

285 PEER REVIEWED GLOBAL COOLI|NG REFERENCES RIGHT HERE!
http://notrickszone.com/285-papers-70s-cooling-1/#sthash.PJoHxopP.dpbs
http://notrickszone.com/285-papers-70s-cooling-2/#sthash.lRcCIvlK.dpbs
http://notrickszone.com/285-papers-70s-cooling-3/#sthash.Tw3Ix8qy.dpbs

>>7751766
>Significantly more papers were Cherry Picked by a person trying to rewrite the past.
FTFY.
Typical warmist drivel. Again, the circle jerk where a warmist writes a paper that attempts to rewrite the past. Never mind the actual history. Just like tampered data, they try to rewrite history.

National Academy of Sciences said there was Global Cooling, pic related.

>>7480224
Here is a National Academy of Sciences graph showing significant cooling. That cooling has been erased.

>>7453181
The National Academy of Science believed in Global Cooling. Pic related.

>>6624047

Can't answer, so hides behind pedantics.
>A core element of GW is that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, that it allows sunlight to pass through it but traps the heat. This is falsifiable.

Wow! What a great strawman argument. No one said CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas. You ignore that it is a WEAK greenhouse gas. You have to DOUBLE the concentration to get a mere 1.2 degrees C increase in global temp (even more if there is the probable negative feedback). In short, temps operate on a logarithmic scale vs. CO2 concentration increase.

>a cooling trend on a centennial scale would be impossible while atmospheric CO2 rises at a non-negligible rate.

Oh boy, anther strawman argument. Again, no one said that CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas. And funny how its been warming since the ice age, especially since the little ice age which was about 400 years ago. So you've said nothing that distinguishes from normal climate variance. BTW, when did it become "centennial." It used to be 17 years. Oh yeah, its been 17 years of no warming. And that cooling that started in 1940 and lasted 30 years - despite a huge increase in CO2 output? Doesn't count, how convenient. Whoops! Another pseudo-falsifiability criterion bites the dust.

>Another claim is that humans contribute CO2 at a non-negligible rate. This is also falsifiable.

Irrelevant. No one said otherwise. You really love these strawman arguments. Seems you've studied hard on how to use rhetorical deceptions to hide an unfalsifiable belief system.