[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.14809908 [View]
File: 83 KB, 2270x839, Excessdeaths2544.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14809908

>>14809686

There are also deaths falsely attributed to covid.

Please explain why there was a large spike of deaths in people not associated with COVID immediately following the vaccination campaign.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362427136_COVID-Period_Mass_Vaccination_Campaign_and_Public_Health_Disaster_in_the_USA_From_agestate-resolved_all-cause_mortality_by_time_age-resolved_vaccine_delivery_by_time_and_socio-geo-economic_data

>> No.14796133 [View]
File: 83 KB, 2270x839, Excessdeaths2544.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14796133

>>14791722
>>14791736

You literally don't even know what 'strawman' means. You are too dumb to be on this board.

This is all cause mortality for US 25-49. Notice how it peaks after the vaccination campaign. These are deaths not associated with covid.

So, I can acknowledge your pick as being due to biases in classifying deaths, while you must explain why more people in this age group died after taking the vaccines than ever before.

>> No.14751751 [View]
File: 83 KB, 2270x839, Excessdeaths2544.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14751751

>>14750630
>can't find that infographic when typing in the source

But you can find the data.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm#dashboard

Confirmation bias is blinding you. Someone else summarizes the data in a very concise form, and you are too lazy (or stupid) to verify it.

Because yes, I did go to the source, and I confirmed the data matches.

>> No.14749732 [View]
File: 83 KB, 2270x839, Excessdeaths2544.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14749732

>>14749705
>There is no absolute reality

Absolute sophistry, that you clearly do not believe in, otherwise you would not fear drinking bleach.

> by suffering you're of course referring to /pol/ gospel about vaccines which you believe is true.

No, I'm basing it on CDC statistics which I believe to be true. I also have numerous examples of individual cases where 'vaccinated' people are now struggling worse with COVID than unvaccinated. Biden, Fauci, and people I personally know. You, however, doublethink all of this away, to suit your masters.

>there is no "the truth"

2+2=4. That's the truth. You can quibble and shift and dance all you like. It's objectively, factually true and no amount of rhetoric changes it.

We have arrived at an impasse because you claim you do not believe objective truth exists. This is a lie, demonstrated by all the ways you refuse to harm yourself.

I agree with you that all human experience is subjective. That is of course, objectively true. However, that does not in anyway imply that objective truth itself does not exist. Mathematics is objective truth.

You've made a mistake in taking the fact that human experience is subjective to somehow implying the universe at large has no objective truths. That the world is an oblate spheroid is an objective truth. It's not the easiest thing to demonstrate, but it is objectively true.

>> No.14728682 [View]
File: 83 KB, 2270x839, Excessdeaths2544.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14728682

>>14727753
>not people dying of vaccines which is orders of magnitude less than covid.

Are you sure about that? The excess mortality rates suggest otherwise.

>> No.14696152 [View]
File: 83 KB, 2270x839, Excessdeaths2544.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14696152

>>14696058

Why didn't you address the fact you blatantly lied?

>The effect you're trying to measure (excess deaths) is literally anticorrelative with the independent variable you're blaming it on (vaccination rate)

This was actually addressed in the original image, but as I said, you cannot cope with it.

Answer: Covid hit the 85+ group the hardest, and therefore created a 'pull forward' in mortality.

Now I answered you. Answer me. Why did you blatantly lie about the fact that 25-44 year olds were getting vaccinated en masse at the threat of losing their careers?

Address the underlying concern that excess mortality was substantially higher AFTER the deployment of the vaccines than at anytime before.

Answer why college students were coerced into taking an emergency use gene therapy for a disease that had approximately a 0% chance to kill them.

But you won't. You never do. You always dance around and try to shift the conversation away from the fact that you are a despicable waste of human life.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]