/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15034992
but too close to the Moon means almost certainly an unstable orbit because of mascons
anyhow certainly an astroonomer would have noticed a fucking skyscraper building moving against that gray

>>12089233
>This would have included an in-space demonstration of the technology
Hasn't there already been a demonstration? The ISS gets refueled by the Russians, and soon SpaceX and Boeing will too.

>>11308625
That's one weirdly shaped weather balloon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBjLNcPRHrw
Wow! That's one speedy weather balloon! Must be traveling faster than an SR-71!

A neat picture of the ISS crossing the moon.

>>11135420
Nice.

>>10688735
>Clearly they don't need to be very good at the conspiracy as they can make dumb mistakes and people like you will still deny there is one because you want space to be real
So the conspiracy is falsifiable then? You can't respond to legitimate criticisms of your theory with "Well, you just don't want to believe that my theory is true!" Maybe bring up some hard evidence of space being faked such as how NASA faked the ISS clearly being seen by literally anyone with eyes.

>Fits with the current mainstream belief regarding reality.
That's not a valid reason. "It fits with everyone's expectations" can also be explained by it being a real thing rather than a fake perpetrated by an unseen conspiracy.

>They also want the possibility of aliens being real to create a threat that will unite mankind.
More speculation isn't evidence. Who's "they"? Why do aliens being real have to rely on spaceflight being a thing? Why do "they" want to unite mankind? Got ANY evidence for this, or are you just going to say "You just too brainwashed"?