[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15232763 [View]
File: 44 KB, 200x253, witten_edward_b1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15232763

>Jews start monopolizing physics and mathematics research in the 1970s

>No new breakthroughs are made now after 50 years while ((they)) direct the world's efforts to fumble around in esoteric garbage like strong theory and quantum gravity.

Coincidence?
Pic related.

>> No.9669823 [View]
File: 46 KB, 200x253, witten_edward_b1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9669823

>be me
>go to a prof office hours
>this guy is brilliant
>does excellent research, wins awards on papers
>able to communicate and teach exceptionally well
>only in his 30s but is full time prof
>every sign points to this guy being brilliant
>asking him questions
>professor, whats the difference between a matrix and a tensor?
>he pauses
>"i actually dont know"
>he hesitates
>"thats a good question because im not sure"
how did this happen?

>> No.8313731 [View]
File: 46 KB, 200x253, wittene.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8313731

I have a friend who has recently finished a PhD in string theory. He wasn't working on anything to do with our universe but instead was working on some tractable problems in a part of string theory. I've read this described not as physics or mathematical physics but instead 'physical mathematics' - i.e. math using physically motivated ingredients and concepts but not with any particular goal to explain anything we can observe.

Is this the end-game for string theory?

Is there any hope that gravity, the standard model of particle physics, dark matter can be explained in terms of strings? I remember a few years ago there seemed to be a lot more noise about the possibility of this but it seems quieter now.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]