/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3435170
Lol, I agree, though I won't force that data on people either (it's interesting though; in particular differences between hetero- and homosexuals such as otoacoustic emission, if you want to give that a look up).

I support people using whatever definitions make them most comfortable. I see no harm in it.

I'm just saying that the cited post is much more likely to start an argument on /sci/ than OP's... or at least I thought that.