/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8618909
>That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).
>Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones globally to be more intense on average (by 2 to 11% according to model projections for an IPCC A1B scenario). This change would imply an even larger percentage increase in the destructive potential per storm, assuming no reduction in storm size.

>you have 10 seconds to convince god to not send you to hell
>what do you say?

Perhaps it would be arrogant for me to say but how exactly do I know Heaven won't have the issues earth did?

He allowed his word to exist in lands that challenged it. Allowed his followers to be either killed or kill for it. Allowed multiple interpretations to exist only to be abused countless times by a number of poorly entrusted envoys.

And yet it is me in the end who must convince him why I should not be sent to hell. Despite the fact every force known to man has arguably conspired to say otherwise or at least cloud it.

Not saying it's all God's fault but how knowledgeable can he expect the average man to be in a world full of contradictions?

And who's to say Hell is any worse than Earth which has clearly demonstrated itself to be a hot bed of pain and suffering?

Perhaps it's not me asking for a pardon for my sins and ignorance but a general clarification for why the world I was brought into became so questionable in the first place. Regardless of where I go at least that part of me will know peace since I will get a definite answer.