/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4069700
>wants to include magic in science

Wtf? There is no theory of intelligent design. You arent talking about science, you are taking about religion. They bitching why there isn't more religion in science?

You are either incredible stupid, or a troll?
Also, tell your mom. I'll be over in 30min, and to wear something pretty for me.

>>3962365
If you have two or more quantum states at the same energy, then you should use "degenerate" perturbation theory, as regular perturbation theory is usually not capable of handeling such.

Do you have some particlar system you are working on, that I can help you with?

>>3926108
Kill him

\thread

>>3898408
The answer to your question is NO.
FTL neutrions does not imply time travel.

>since it should technically be going back in time when it's faster than C

Nope, where the fuck are you getting this nonsense? Special Relativity is obviouly in need of a modification is FTL exists. You cannot just attemp to apply it to shit it wasn't ment to be applied to, YOU WILL GET BULLSHIT. Do you also try to divide by 0? How is that working out for you?

>>3844805
>Implying I ain't doing ground breaking research at CERN

>>3833660
I love how you jump to such shitty conclusions. You must be a christian. How many times do you go to church a week?

Please show me where those scientific teams said they observed FTL travel? Citation?

NO WHERE in there paper/seminar/press relase DID THEY ONCE MENTION AN FTL interpretation for there findings. They decided to actually do science, and not jump to shitty conclusions, unlike you.

It was shitty people like you, who don't know how to science, that decided to start spouting FTL bullshit. People like you give scienists and science a bad reputation.

>>3809358
You want to troll someone who's only job is to help you suceed and make the most out of your life?

WTF is wrong with you? Grow the fuck up retard!

>>3788608
>>3788610
The people attenting lecture are all physicists.
This is a physics lecture, by physicist for physicists. This is pretty standard at CERN. They have mutiple lecture like this every day.

>>3784371
THIS JUST IN:

/sci/ over-reacts to unpublished, unverified, unpresented, and unshared, "possibly scientific" results.

/sci/ totally ignores actually scientific discoveries, and goes BAT-SHIT INSANE over one physicists ramblings to bad media sources.

>>3746306
>>3746034
An overwhelimg majority (99.999%) of particle physicst do not use the concept of "relativitic mass" anymore. Even Einstien grew to dislike this concept. It leads to many problems with the way we define the modern notion of "mass" and "objects".

In particle physics we use mass as a "constant property" to define a type of particle. This is the easiest way of book-keeping we have. We then define "motion" of the particle in terms of momentum, in analogy to the rest of physics. The information encoded in the mass, and momentum is plently.

We don't need the concept of "relativistic mass" because we already have the same information encoded in the momentum and mass. Hence, using relativitic mass is just redundnant, and add unneccary varibles. Why would we want to add redundant varibles?

You can use this concept if you wish, but ALL OF PHYSICS CAN BE DONE WITHOUT IT. In fact most of special relativity and general relativity is neater and easier without such a flawed concept.

>first discipline to separate from philosophy
>the one that's responsible from taking religion out of schools
>the discipline that studies life and living organisms, including their function, growth, distribution, evolution and taxonomy
>/sci/ implies is not a science and that it's "easy"

>spending billions and billions in building a huge ass tube for the only purpose of looking at an invisible particle
>/sci/ implies is one of the most important sciences

Fuck you guys

Why so many pedophiles in /sci/? It's repugnant.

>>2195661
>big city lights