/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11247977
>Completely untrue. That little 'fact' forgets to mention that non whites are more likely to hit a target level of IMPROVEMENT in their schoolwork. It tells you nothing. It most likely means that their targets for improvement are set lower, which makes sense if they've had zero education
No retard, it's a well known fact that Black African girls outperform White British girls in the British school system.

>Why is it so hard for all you ideologues
/pol/ niggers are the only ideologues here posting fake infographics and debunked maps.

>to accept that the differences in base intelligence are quite small
That's what I've been saying.

>the vast majority of research points to people from the equator being below people outside it?
There is nothing to suggest the difference is genetic when environmental reasons can account for 100% of the difference. There could be a genetic component or not. What is ideological is to go the extra male to claim it is a genetic difference with fake infographics taken from active white supremacist sites.

>You really want to push the race baiting, blacks are the least likely candidates to be 'superior' as a race.
Strawman much, nobody is saying Blacks are superior, /pol/ nigger.

>>11247977
>Completely untrue. That little 'fact' forgets to mention that non whites are more likely to hit a target level of IMPROVEMENT in their schoolwork. It tells you nothing. It most likely means that their targets for improvement are set lower, which makes sense if they've had zero education
No retard, it's a well known fact that Black African boys outperform White British boys in the British school system.

>Why is it so hard for all you ideologues
/pol/ niggers are the only ideologues here posting fake infographics and debunked maps.

>to accept that the differences in base intelligence are quite small
That's what I've been saying.

>the vast majority of research points to people from the equator being below people outside it?
There is nothing to suggest the difference is genetic when environmental reasons can account for 100% of the difference. There could be a genetic component or not. What is ideological is to go the extra male to claim it is a genetic difference with fake infographics taken from active white supremacist sites.

>You really want to push the race baiting, blacks are the least likely candidates to be 'superior' as a race.
Strawman much, nobody is saying Blacks are superior, /pol/ nigger.

>>9109467
>it's le outliers bro
yes, yes i bet that's why they perform as well as the chinese
nah, you are going to have to prove it's outliers that moved, because no group has ever truly displayed that.
saying 'it's just outliers' without any sort of proof is bullshit

in fact, literal former indian slaves built a nice country trinidad and tobago(juts to have nigs ruin it today, but that's a different story)
not to mention even earlier historical precedent

vast majority of times in history when some group moves, they are pretty representative
see whites outside of europe, blacks outside of africa, chinese outside of europe, white people moving around inside europe

>>8617115
Diaspora matters.

When Indian diaspora has a higher average IQ than the white natives, they, by definition, have a better genetic potential than the native populace.
>>8617117
The same as any IQ data posted on this site.

>>8539603
it's inconvenient

http://www.unz.com/article/the-iq-gap-is-no-longer-a-black-and-white-issue/

pol BTFO
4chan BTFO