/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12106987
based, we keep putting shit on the x and y axis, calling them independent and thus orthogonal, but when the theories reveal x(y) and y(x) we gotta do some extra work to get back to independence and orthogonality.

>Newton was a theologian, not a scientist.
based I call him the last of the wizards, with his newtonian gematria!

> it's mass grows rapidly, ego grows.
poetry > math

> Why particles have strong self correction wave?
I'm currently studying phase conjugate mirrors and non-linear optics, you may find these intriguing as I do

>>12035570
based and red pilled

>>11963879
Indeed, I've been wrestling with this myself lately. Like Buckminster Fuller's views on the irrationality of pi summed up well in http://www.arvindguptatoys.com/arvindgupta/synergy-fuller.pdf

chapter 2

How many digits of pi will nature attempt to calculate before she gives up and procures a fake bubble. No, Bucky is right, nature isn't using pi. And i have an ear open to the scientific-esoterics who believe that pi has a natural end in natures calculator.

irrationality and the ... and so on so forth operator make rich and elegant metaphysical maths, but not one that is evoked easily in nature

>>11955808
based

>>11938953
in fact, if one was able to slow light down enough before arriving, so too will the gravitation signal... I wonder if a bose-einstein condensate could fulfill this task, spinning so they never quite reach the center of the media, (our ship). Anon, you've unlocked something for me, thank you.