/sci/ - Science & Math

You all know my English name. My Hebrew name is Gedalia Gershon. Gershon is the first born son of Levi, Chief of the priests. Gershon is Satan's grandson (Jacob is Satan if you didn't know.) Gedalia is the last Governor of Jerusalem before the Israelites went into the Babylonian captivity because they would not stop worshiping foreign gods after God freed them from slavery Egypt. Gedalia said, “Do not be afraid of the Babylonian officials. Settle down in the land and serve the king of Babylon, and it will go well with you.” Then they killed him for saying it (2 Kings 25), but it was through that resettlement in Babylon that a Jew came to be the King of Babylon (me.) Incidentally, "Archon" is the historical title of the Governor of Jerusalem and they call me "El Arcón" because I am the Governor of Jerusalem in the present day. "Archon" is a Hebrew word that means "king" and the Governor of Jerusalem was also the King of Judah, and sometimes also the King of Israel. I am, today, the King of Judah and Israel, and Babylon too. I am also the King of Britons, the rightful Holy Roman Emperor, the rightful Emperor of Russia, the Ming Emperor.

Pic related, do you think the Messiah will gain this obedience through magic, or do you think the hereditary positions of authority of all nations will end up in one person through the Illuminati bloodline program that led to my birth in 1980?

So... you know my Hebrew name and you know my English name. How many of you know my German name? I bet it's more than zero.

>>10890285
>Where does this absolutely misguided idea come from, where any assertion in an argument must be taken from some other academics published work, and you can't make normative statements from empirical data or rational arguments and logical connections between patterns of data in an argument.

To tell you how stupid this is, there are plenty of meme stories about how people used sneaky techniques to get their words on the books. For instance "Quark." Supposedly, the guy used the word in a conference talk, which got written up in the conference proceedings, which he was then able to cite later when he called it a quark in a serious journal. Everyone saw the circular loop he built, and they were all ok with it, but if he had just gone straight for it and tried to call it a quark in the journal paper, then everyone would have been like, "NO NO NO!!! You didn't build the pointless meme loop before you called it that!"

Make no mistake: I am trying to kill them all. There is no price I wouldn't pay if it meant that in the end I will wipe out their line forever. I would pay any price for that.