/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16032890
can we get a timeframe op? in how many years after managerial degree to get 750K, like 10+?

>>10759076
Wet dreams are mostly cowper's fluid and contain a fraction of the sperm of a voluntary emission. It wouldn't be viable for donation. You would waste everyone's time. The device would probably serve to make wet dream's more frequent anyway so pretty stupid if you ask me.

>>10614320
Decreased evolutionary pressure makes intelligence less likely to be propagated as a trait, not more, brainlet.

>>10510810
Anthropogenic production of various gasses and indeed pollutants do exist, and nowhere in any of my posts did I deny that. What I did deny is your claims of "excess" CO2 and your idea of "unprecedented rates" of it, which were, by you, unsubstantiated, sans your fallacious, ridiculous, and "obvious" affirming of the consequent.

>>10449258
>my chiropractor has an MD

I'll tell you tomorrow.

>>9640733
Species exist and are empirical. You have conceded this already. I have already laid out a condition that would disprove evolution (the "amoeba world" as you put it would disprove the theory of evolution). However, we see that there are more than just amoebas in this world. That doesn't make the claim unfalsifiable. It just makes you wrong.

>>9406839
>chimes into thread without any constructive input
>implies someone is a brainlet
kek
A model using posterior probability distribution explicitly isn't bayesian?
Naive Bayes is a pretty common usage of bayesian stats for ML applications, dunno what your getting at

How would you answer OP's question anon?