/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16165569
Lived truth, bigot.

>Scientists baffled by "Dark Geometry" and its very measurable "Dark Angles".

Carry
[clap]
The Zero
[clap]

>>16098262
A wierd tri-point of reality. Curious as to what force to apply to it to make it do what I dream of.

I havnt really heard anything, but I havnt been looking for it either. Maybe the things we calls stuff makes us not see it in other ways...

>>15988527
You didnt specifiy space curvature!

>>15770322
Then all measure is estimation.

Science is a lie!

>>15492548
>has very high crank content
Not cranky enough, I say.

>>15310799
>3. Read anything other than textbook facts
Sure hope there isnt some sort of consensus on facts...

>>15310238
Yes. If you call this a triangle you hate words. If you say its a rectangle you hate shapes.

What is it? Hate. Its hate. Everything is Hate.

>>15295107
Thats why I put one on...The name is irrelevent, go roll a a random one.

>>15272192
>he cant invent numbers and mathematics to solve his physics equations

Nah, you aint hot shit, pal. You havnt invent 1.5-D combinatorics equation to calculate two square roots, which cirrelates to Pentagonal geometry (aka Phi).

fite me

>>15235404
>learning
>not teaching

>>15077273
Youre not even student level, otherwise you would have posted it.

You did, you wont, you cant.

>>15068231
Believe what they say, not what they do.

. .

>>15066918
>The MU could be stated quite simply in the phrase "different but the same".

Sold. Sing me up.

>>15061834
I know.

>>15059377
>because debating if infinity exists
Master both cases, never be wrong.

https://youtu.be/E_dGqavx5AU

Nornan basically makes the case for both sides, infinity is basically a drynamic measuring, Penrose does the same thing in Physics. Just cut it off "at the end/infinity" and call it a day.

Side length 1. You keep reading a numeral, thats wrong.

Side length Z. Better? The symbol doesnt mattet here as the "metric" you divide it up is up to you, not 12" or 10cm or whatever. The ancients didnt have "Standard Units of Measure".

The did math without numbers, you, and Norman, dont fully understand Number Theory (like I do) but Normans works point out a lot I have in the past so Im a fan of his works, even though we disagree about some of the details or reasonings.

>>15053982
>Science is just an epistemology guy.

Yeah, and my GR ruler doesnt align with your QM metrics.

Sorry, you just dont understand what Im saying and kesp posting back your arguments (now realizing its about determinism and free will as you didnt conprehend my previous post, its all over your head.)

Welp....good day, sir.

>>15052863
>If OP says it's a square, then it's a square
If she identifies as a rectangle who are you to deny her lived truth?

Her documents even say she is; >>15052811

Deal with it, racist asshole.