/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10648790
>he doesn't use a quill

What is the actual job situation for someone with an:

A. Bachelors
B. Masters
C. PhD.

in Chemistry? If I'm genuinely interested in chemistry, should I study it on my own time and major in something else? Am I going to get fucked and be doomed to a life of unpaid internships or crappy analytical work?

Also, why is chemistry the least popular STEM concentration? My uni has thousands of bio majors, hundreds of physics and math majors, but only around 30 chem majors at any given time. Everyone I know hates chemistry except for the people actually majoring in it.

>>8030811
>live a vacuous life
>never experience any form intellectual achievement
>never get the sense of accomplishment from having the importance of you work acknowledged
>never contribute in any meaningful way to human knowledge
sounds like a shit deal to me

but obviously if you compare it to all of the above as well as:
>being a social pariah
>even the most primitive people regard you as human waste
>have to struggle through life just to pay for your existence
>never get laid

then it does seem like a good deal.

>Not using quill and ink like euphoric fedora master race
>plebs

Can someone tell me how my precalc professor, who has PhD's in math and fluid dynamics, get basic arithmetic and proofs wrong so often that the class corrects him several times per lecture?

I would think that maybe he's doing it to test people's attention and keep them engaged, but this guy seems legitimately stumped, like he stops, thinks, works through it and then says "oh yeah, you're right."

Has anyone else had a professor like this?