/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14573505
> It seems amazing that those who advocate energy conservation haven’t noticed what happens: As soon as some energy is freed up by conservation, the technological world-system gobbles it up and demands more. No matter how much energy is provided, the system always expands rapidly until it is using all available energy, and then it demands still more.

The thing he misses here is that the reason why this happens is because capitalism work to satisfy humans desires. Those desires, left unchecked, are the cardinal sins. Greed, gluttony, lust, sloth, pride in particular. This is why christian communism is the only coherent ideology and the only path forward for humanity.

This was my daily schizopost.

>>12798930
Social democracy coming through. pic related

Have any of you effectively taught yourself STEM things? How did you do it?

how do i effectively self-teach /sci/ things I'm interested in? i've seen the book guides but i really want to make sure i remember what i learned and improve my critical thinking so I'm less retarded.

well this explains alot

https://www.vice.com/en/article/m7aap8/the-man-who-helped-turn-4chan-into-the-internets-racist-engine

I don't even think brain uploading is possible. Even if it is it will never be "you" it will always be a copy. "You" is the substrate of your brain. Providing power to it just turns you on.

the cat is optimal form. big penises are the human's peacock

What is the most abstract?

I get why some people believe online learning is shit when it comes to youtube channels like Crash Course since they offer an extremely brief and superficial explanation of topics, but Sal is a lot more specific with the math and theory involved in these sciences.

Philosochad here, yes he is.

>>11475602
> What are the long term effects of a virus discovered 4 month ago

Flat earth bullshit is pushed by jews to discredit people who believe in the conspiracy theories that are actually true

>>11194183
equals to da digits

>>11078208
All math is just counting, adding is just based on counting

>Our anonymized study, n=81,522, found that...
>Relatives of high-functioning autistic individuals tend to have better spatial reasoning ability than verbal reasoning ability as well as IQ scores clustered around 100 and minimal facial asymmetry.
>Relatives of low-functioning autistic individuals tend to have better spatial reasoning ability than verbal reasoning ability as well as unusual incidence rates of IQ scores significantly higher or lower than 100 and statistically significant rates of facial asymmetry.
>Relatives of high-functioning schizophrenic individuals tend to have better verbal reasoning ability than spatial reasoning ability as well as IQ scores clustered around 100 and minimal facial asymmetry.
>Relatives of low-functioning schizophrenic individuals tend to have better verbal reasoning ability than spatial reasoning ability as well as unusual incidence rates of IQ scores significantly higher or lower than 100 and statisticall significant rates of facial asymmetry.
So guys, are there two spectrums with normies in the middle of both and schizos and autists the opposite of each other?

How do I get an A in physics?

Is there a scientific reason for why humans seem to have an aversion to people who prefer to be alone? In school, they are ridiculed and harassed for being "lame". And in the real world, they are stereotyped as being terrorists and creepy weirdos

I do not know anything empirical about the expanding margins of the space-time continuum and think you are retarded. However, I have a strong inkling as a biosemiotic panexperientialist that the expansion of space is the expansion of the minds semiotic regime. It is the pure flow of relation into potentiality. The universe is not expanding into some sort of spooky nonuniverse, it's flowing into it's own ens in posse, chasing the spoor that it projects.

>>10796311
I see you’re a big brain as well

hello cesspool of the most retarded people i have ever encountered

i was looking through some nazi ufo stuff and one of the purported anti-gravity machines inside the ufo was shaped like a particle accelerator, apparently they found a submarine with a bunch of mercury in it escaping from germany after the war headed to south america. mercury was been used in ion engines in american aerospace since ww2

is it possible that what people may think is an antigravity machine is really just a particle accelerator which can vent high energy particles out at high speeds.

if particle accelerators can accelerate matter to close to the speed of light, would this not be an excellent form of propulsion for spacecraft?

i have never heard of particle accelerator rings being used in spacecraft before, does anybody know if that have been?

perhaps what people think is antigravity technology is really not, but it has been only been revealed as that so that people will not take it seriously

>>10179326
>>10179295
watch out, we got a smokefag here

>I don't even know what science is

>tfw too intelligent to be limited by my own intelligence

I keep hearing from people of this board that EE is dead.

Well it isn't. EE overlaps sweetly with artificial intelligence. And not in the machine learning codemonkey way you're probably thinking. For example, say you want a device that can read brain signals and output a significant image or word or anything meaningfull. Who would be better suited for this? A CS brainlet that only knows how to code? Or an EE that knows signal processing AND machine learning? Obviously you'd want the EE. This is a silly example but if you're smart you'll see how it can be extrapolated into the real world.

Don't believe me? Hear it from an expert, Kush R. Varshney, in "How an Electrical Engineer Became an Artificial
Intelligence Researcher, a Multiphase Active
Contours Analysis"

https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.11261

tl;dr EEs in machine learning/AI jobs is and will be a reality. This implies EE is not dead (this deduction I'll leave it as exercise for the reader)