/sci/ - Science & Math

Gone are the days when these threads could garner five fools to let make them look stupid.

Stupid criticisms:
1) Definitions 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 comprise a circle because the range of the Euclidean metric could be taken as R instead of N or Q, and despite the fact that the line being equipped with "a function" does not depend on the function's range, be it R, Q, N, or any other thing.
2) The neighborhood of infinity is not allowed by the field axioms which did not exist until long after Hilbert's 1899 paper.
3) The neighborhood of infinity is not allowed by the 1872 Dedekind cut and Cauchy definitions which somehow constrain Riemann's 1859 hypothesis.
4) Although algebra is called the study of mathematical symbols and the rules for manipulating them, infinity hat is "magic," not mundane, and therefore it is not allowed.
5) The Archimedes property of real numbers is not what Euclid said it is. It is what Rudin says it is.
6) By the axiom that every real number is less than some natural number, every real number is less than some natural and, therefore. alternative axiomatic schemes are not admissible.
7) Although all the sentences in the paper contain the formal subject-predicate construction, the sentences are actually incomprehensible gibberish.
8) Although Clay explicitly rules out the trivial zeros at the negative integers, zeros which everyone knows are out of scope, they also ruled out the zeros in the neighborhood of infinity but they just didn't do it explicitly like they did with the negative even integers.

Who will add to the list? Anything I forgot?

>retards social understanding.
People who say these things seem to take the position that everyone who doesn't get along doesn't get along because they're retarded when the truth is that some nice number of people who don't get along don't get along because they reject a retarded society and prefer to show disdain for it than to try to get along with it. For retards, however, it looks like everyone who doesn't get along doesn't get along because they are too retarded to get along, and that is not right.

One day God is going to show up and destroy this society that you all think is only rejected by retards.

>>11753352
Anyone who doesn't stand for fascism is silently against it, you mean.

>>11257316
Anyone who thinks it their place to clean it up as they see fit, but not my place to clean it up as I see fit, will have no share in the tree of life.

Also, disinfo propaganda campaigns don't contain mistakes. Those things are called lies.

Blessed are the meek: those who stayed far away from me, those were not so bold as to seek to exalt themselves with the glory of my presence.

It's too late to solve this problem isn't it?