/sci/ - Science & Math

GTFO

>>5647752
>isaiah 40:22
>He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth
>circle
nothing about a sphere there. circle is 2d, not 3d.

>science then
>only 1100 stars
wtf is this??

anyway, he's wrong on the first couple, i'd just ignore him

>>5642610
>2013 the year of our lord
you have a point to make?
people 2000 years ago might have been gullible fucktards, but since then theres been no reason to alter a dating system that already works. it'd just be confusing.
their religion is still wrong.

>>5496810

>>5151753
>and evolution states that all species will continue to evolve until they are perfect...
yeh, that's where he fucked up

this >>5151788

>>4888578
>JIDF
i actually had to google that
>Jewish Internet Defense Force
wow, you must be new here.
i'm well known for hating religions in all its forms
(actually, buddism is cool, but then i dont consider it to even be a religion, and there arnt any gods in buddism)

nigger-faggot.

>>4176410
whatever
fucking get on it then.

we're waiting, hun.

>science deals exclusively with the physical realm and non other.
yes, the 'physical realm' being that which is real, with everything else being imagined, dreamed, or hallucinated.

if god is not in the physical realm, he does not exist.
(also, wtf? supposedly in fucking biblical texts etc he fucks around loads in the physical realm, doing fantastic miracles, pillars of fire and whatnot. curiously stops as soon as mankind gains the ability to accurately record events.)

>>3779950
buttfrustrated christfag detected?
jesus still condones the OT
>"I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."

'the law' being gods law, as in, that of the OT.

>>3272624

>>3179948
did you even read the fucking quote?
hitler was catholic, to him jews are 'christ killers'
his motive was religious.
My motive isn't. i just cant stand stupid gullible people who talk shit and yet somehow manage to be able to gain political power and win popular support.

>>2313247
im not bitter, im just being very 'matter-of-factly
and a realist.

Hey, /sci/

So I've been having this ongoing religion debate with my friends. My main argument is that it is scientifically impossible and, according to science, there can't be a god. Now, my friends' responce to that is that "science isn't always right".

What do I say to this? Also, general religion thread.