[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.4911814 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 182 KB, 630x595, us-moonlanding[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4911814

A friend of mine believes we never landed on the moon. I personnaly never cared enough about it to question it, but is he right?

>> No.1744133 [View]
File: 182 KB, 630x595, fakeshit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1744133

pic related

>> No.1712544 [View]
File: 182 KB, 630x595, moon_landing_630px.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1712544

>1) NASA didn't have the technology to send a man all the way to the moon AND bring him back alive

During the mid-1960s the Apollo Support Department of the General Electric Company in Florida conducted extensive mission reliability studies for NASA. These studies were based on very elaborate reliability models of all of the systems. A reliability profile over the course of a mission was generated by computer simulation, and a large number of such simulations were carried out for different scenarios. Based on those studies, the probability of landing on the moon and returning safely to earth never dropped below 90%.

None of the Apollo missions, with the exception of number 13, experienced a major technical problem that prohibited the crews from successfully completing their missions. Also, the early Apollo flights were test missions designed specifically to shake out bugs in the hardware and procedures. Finally, the moon landings were far from flawless. There were numerous technical problems but, thanks to the skill of the flight controllers, engineers and astronauts, the problems were either corrected or circumvented such that the crews were able to complete their missions with amazing success.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]