/sci/ - Science & Math

need help with some trig and logs

cosx+2secx=-3
and
log(x+1)=2log(x-1) base 10 on both

need an explination on how to solve please

>>5486165
Can someone please tell me what they mean by "babby"?
i.e. Babby course, Babby's first theoretical physics.

>>4208307

>>2303592

It is, in fact, quite easy to disprove that argument. God could indeed be able to create an unliftable stone and lift it without any logical flaws.

Here´s a better argument:

If god was omnipotent, he would be ale to create another omnipotent being. This second omnipotent being "attacks" the first one by trying to take his omnipotence from him. There are two possible outcomes:
1.: The attack succeeds. This means, the first entity is not able to prevent this attack, which therefore means, he is and was not omnipotent.
2.: The attack fails. In this case, the second being is not omnipotent, because he is not able to attack the first being. This means the first being was not able to create another omnipotent being, which therefore means, he is and was not omnipotent at all.

Summary: Omnipotence is impossible.

What would happen if we switched the planets Venus and Mars in their orbits? In other words, move Venus out to Mars' orbit, and move Mars in to Venus' orbit.

I think both of them would become more habitable. Venus' thick atmosphere would retain enough heat to make it livable (assuming we had sulfuric acid proof structures and spacesuits), but being further away from the sun prevents it from broiling at 800 degrees Centigrade. And moving Mars closer would heat it up significantly, which is nice because 1) this would melt the ice caps, putting water vapor into it's atmosphere and increasing the atmospheric pressure, 2) said melting would also allow liquid water on the surface, and 3) simply bringing it closer to the Sun would make it more livable.

Nontrollscienceblox

>>1630796
Of course not. If a little tinfoil was all it took to kill /sci/ threads, /x/ would have wiped us out months ago.

good, 'cos I just ran out.