/sci/ - Science & Math

So you have a device that will kill a random different human every second, somewhere on the planet, perpetually. However you are able to fine tune said randomness with some specifics.

We know that currently the number of births outstrip number of deaths by at least double, but is there some way to maximise the effect such a device might have, even eventually, if you play the long game and wish to achieve a more culled number, like say 1 billion?

This is a thought experiment obviously.
Currently my idea is to have the device targeting random pregnant women that are pregnant with female twins/triplets/quaduplets (etc.), and slowly working our way up in descending order until you have women currently normally pregnant with a single female babe.

At this point I still am not sure if this will put an eventual dent in the number of people on earth being born vs. dying. The long game was to skew the ratio of young, available girls for men to pair with towards an imbalanced large number of men, who are likely to spark conflict/commit suicide, die earlier due to higher sexual frustration.

There might, however be more efficient ways to go about equalizing or reversing the births/deaths ratio with perhaps targeted kills of prominent disease researchers about to make breakthroughs or the people active in curing disease. This would promote diseases to come through and wipe many of us out.

Hell, there's probably something better I'm not considering. Remember our goal is to seek population balance, and then possibly regressions to a more maintainable number.

This is a weird thread, but its what we're here for.

>>9184223

>>8893512
See this is what I love about the chans. Your argument literally holds no value

Allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go.

Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

>>7997355
I wouldn't have done shit and I can rightfully and proudly say so because I can't be asked to do a god damned thing.