/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16097825
>Sothe fact that your objectivity is questionable is irrelevant?
Yes. Because it is. What matters are the facts.

>Okay, then I guess you simply have to accept that the Holocaust happened.
No, I don't.
I would accept it if the genocide claims weren't contradicted by the available evidence. But they are.

>So how did a bunch of starving and diseased prisoners who'd been robbed of wealth and property threaten consequences on their liberators, exactly?
They aren't diseased and starving now, are they.
Neither are they poor or powerless today.

>How did they manage to clay the foundations for this plot even from within the camps, still, when the war was going on?
This is actually a good question. It's safe to say that the plan to promulgate the holocaust hoax wasn't hatched by prisoners.
What actually happened is that prisoners spread wild rumors amongst themselves, and repeated them once they were liberated. These were added to the other wild slanders invented by partisan propagandists in central Europe, and Allied psych warfare operations.

The atrocity propaganda of the Holocaust hoax accomplished many political goals, including morally legitimizing the Allies, who were guilty of horrendous war crimes against civilians. It's still being used today for the same purpose: to lend moral legitimacy to Israel and the jews, who are currently committing genocide in the Palestinian territories.

my dad is making me block emf from the powerbox that's outside my bedroom. He wants me to do it using a metal sheet attached to the opposite side of the wall. How thick does the metal need to be to block all emf from it?

Can someone explain this to me? How's that even possible?

What is the reason for the elegance of math in physics, constituting the extent of your knowledge about reality, that isn't only laziness of the physicist?