/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6908507
>>6908522
>>6908524
>>6908527

>OP: Let's talk about basic logic and how it relates to science

>Anons: MUUH eViL ATHEIST! LOGIC ISN'T REAL! SciENCE Isn't REAL!

>>6902737
>>6902753
1) That isn't how proofs go. That is how a conditional goes! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional

2) It still needs to be proved dip-shit! You need to prove that P is true (else you are just talking about hypothetical).
And you need to prove that P->Q, aka
That is you need to demonstrate:
(P=true, Q=true) is a true statement
(P=true, Q=false) is false statement
(P=false, Q=true) is true statement
(P=false, Q=true) is true statement

3) That isn't what you are doing anyhow.

>a God would create the world in a beautiful manner
Your P = god (or some aspect of god)
Your Q = a beautiful world
What you are doing is saying Q is true so then P is true! That is Q->P. It is nonsensical!

4) You're a fucking idiot!!!! Read a goddam book.