/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8166330
>http://www.brainpreservation.org/
Oh Jesus, I didn't see this at first.
I'm going to assume OP is samefagging to drive up hits to his scam site,
Go get a real job OP, and stop trying to make a quick buck by exploring the insecurities of others.

>>8007713
>try eating unseasoned meat forever lmao
A good steak (or chicken breast, or pork chop) needs only salt to achieve perfection.

>>pigs and cows are eating animals and need humans to exist
>honestly just a silly thing to say
Why is that silly?
There are no wild cows, and wild pigs are very rare compared to domestic pigs.
99.9% of pigs and 100% of cattle would NOT exist if all people were vegan.

>you want to be a cogent human or a non-thinking retard.
>anybody who doesn't make the same choices I do has a learning disability

Wow, for a superior person, you sure are a douche.

>>7984234
>There is no need to understand why something works, as long as it works.
That works OK for stuff up to the early industrial revolution, but that's not how we got transistors, IC's, superconductors, RADAR, chemotherapy, the Apollo moon landings, post-it notes, ice beer or nanobots.

>I have no clue what is really happening, and I'd wager no one alive does, either.
As this Anon said, we don't have much understanding of gravity's underlying mechanism, but we do know (100%) that mass attracts mass.
There is NO serious doubt on this.
You're just being stubborn to serve you own selfish emotional need to feel superior to all of society.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Edgar_Lilienfeld
>Sounds like he was heavily involved in empirical research.
That's iffy.
I WOULD point out that he was obviously involved with the development of scientific theory AND relied on theory developed by others in his work, but it's moot, because he wasn't on the team that invented the transistor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor#History
>Physicist Julius Edgar Lilienfeld filed a patent
(notice "Physicist"?)
>Physicist Julius Edgar Lilienfeld filed a patent
for a field-effect transistor (FET) in Canada in 1925, which was intended to be a solid-state replacement for the triode.[4][5] Lilienfeld also filed identical patents in the United States in...
>nor did his patents cite any specific examples of a working prototype.
>. Because the production of high-quality semiconductor materials was still decades away, Lilienfeld's solid-state amplifier ideas would not have found practical use in the 1920s and 1930s, even if such a device had been built.[9]
So he came up with the IDEA, based on his work in physics, but never actually built one.
You're just 100% wrong on this one, the technology is based entirely on theoretical physics, not trial and error "evolution".

>>7733226
Wow, what a douche.